VVZ API is not affiliated with ETH Zurich. Data might be outdated or incorrect. Please view the official ETHZ Vorlesungsverzeichnis for binding information.
On Mediocrity - Tracing the Average in Architectural History
Last Updated: 2026-06-03 00:07:21
Abstract
What does it mean to call a building, a career, or a life mediocre, and who decides? This seminar takes mediocrity seriously as a historical and conceptual problem, tracing its long inversion from classical virtue to the sin of hustle culture, and exploring how different architectural history might look when written from the middle of the curve.
Objective
The pressure to occupy the top is everywhere. Grinding, hustle culture, rat race: call it what you like, the constant quest for excellence is felt in architecture culture with particular intensity. Over-curated portfolios, constant reviews, all-nighters, toxic studio culture, and office overtime are the daily texture of a discipline that organizes itself around masterpieces, starchitects, and prizes, sinking into the cult of individual recognition and pushing the bar ever higher. Most of what gets built, however, is not a masterpiece. Most architects are not geniuses. Most careers leave no monograph behind. And while the history of greatness is well charted, with multiple accounts of how ideals of genius, mastery, and exceptional achievement have shifted across periods and cultures, mediocrity has received little of that attention. It tends to be taken for granted, an undifferentiated and historically stable byproduct of meritocratic systems. This seminar starts there. It treats mediocrity as a historical category with its own trajectory, asking how the figure of the mediocre architect has been produced and managed by the institutions that grade architectural work, organize disciplinary memory, value labor, and confer aesthetic judgment. It engages the politics of merit and the contemporary critique of meritocracy as a structuring ideology of universities and design offices. It examines how questions of access, exclusion, and recognition shape who is taken seriously and who is not, and how feminist, postcolonial, and labor-oriented scholarship has reframed those questions. It considers the average not only as a statistical artifact but as a design instrument, embedded in standards, types, and norms that quietly govern what gets built. And it takes seriously the aesthetic afterlife of the mediocre, the banal, the derivative, the kitsch, the unfinished, asking whether what the discipline has dismissed as failed taste might be reclaimed as something else entirely. Through seminar discussions, collective in-class exercises, and archival visits, students will analyze how merit, value, and historical visibility are constructed, and will experiment with alternative ways of writing architectural history. Particular attention will be given to feminist and labor-oriented critiques of meritocracy, and to contemporary initiatives that propose collective and structural alternatives to the cult of individual recognition. By the end of the semester, students will have developed conceptual and methodological tools to question inherited categories of merit, to think critically about the cultures of competition that shape university life and the profession beyond it, and to take seriously the vast architectural production that has been graded, ranked, and quietly forgotten.
General Information
- Language
- English
- Levels
- BSC
- Frequency
- Yearly recurring
Examination
- Type
- ungraded semester performance
Course Components
| Type | Title | Time & Place | Hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| seminar |
On Mediocrity - Tracing the Average in Architectural History
No course on October 22 (seminar week) and in the last two weeks of the semester.
|
No time listed | 2 h weekly |